Culture
The Office - Dvd Screensaver Cube2 minutes read.
My humble effort to help you start the weekend with a smile on your face. I wonder how much of it happens to me when I talk, after all "some days I'm just on fire!"
🗃️ Read it later via
Pocket or
Instapaper.
📣 Share it via
Twitter or
email.
Software Has Bugs. This is Normal.4 minutes read.
"Throwing ever bigger teams at problems usually just makes the problems bigger still... Useless software can be entirely bug free, yet remain entirely useless. Useful software can be ridden with bugs, yet remain highly valuable. Or, the value of software depends far more upon the problem it solves than the quality by which it does so." -- great piece by DHH, making me think of bugs as sort of technical-debt that worth the same attention when it comes to prioritization, i.e. figuring impact, investment, users' frustration, current scale etc. You cannot throw endless engineers or QA to eradicate bugs. Such state of mind will probably only eradicate your business due to ridiculous (salaries) burn-rate. Set expectations accordingly and align your prioritization process to reduce internal frustration.
🗃️ Read it later via
Pocket or
Instapaper.
📣 Share it via
Twitter or
email.
Entropy Crushers7 minutes read.
Calling project managers Entropy Crushers might be a good marketing approach (a la Growth Hackers): "They are here to help with X because if we don’t solve X, we are screwed... A good project manager’s job is to decrease chaos by increasing clarity. I understand that chaos can be an essential ingredient in creative, but I guarantee you — I promise you — even with the best project manager on board, you still get to run around like a crazy person because the sky always unexpectedly falls. Chaos in a complex system is a guarantee." -- Michael Lopp (aka Rands) claims it's time for more Project Managers. While I understand, I'd like to further push the envelope. There is no need for Engineering Managers to do it either, or at least carry this burden alone. We need to scale this concept. There is a huge value in teaching senior engineers (who want to, of course) to improve their project planning skills and communication skills. They can do the trade-offs, offer alternatives, align people around them etc. The same happened in the "QA world", where much of the automated testing shifted to engineering. It just scales better, if you're willing to embrace it and mentor people to improve their planning skills & soft skills. Many companies fail to define & teach, thus falling back to "lets hire". In the long-term I believe it creates too much waste.
🗃️ Read it later via
Pocket or
Instapaper.
📣 Share it via
Twitter or
email.
Selfconf: Empowering Group Learning For Software Engineers3 minutes read.
This post is by yours truly. We share a lot of great read on a few internal Slack rooms, but I wanted to create something bigger than that. SelfConf is a frugal way to get your team within the same room, and get them to share talks they believe made a difference. It helps to create emotional bonding, where people can not only see a great talk together, but also hear why it was chosen and learn more about the person who offered it. We're planning to do another one in a couple of months, and people already started to send some great talks they'd like to recommend. Hope that this is something you can use in your company.
🗃️ Read it later via
Pocket or
Instapaper.
📣 Share it via
Twitter or
email.
